Sector : Plantation
Sub
Sector :
Plantation
Part IV – Summary of comparison based on 2018
From the evaluation above,
SIMEPLT (12 points), BKAWAN (10 points), IOICORP (11 Points), UTDPLNT (10
points), FAREAST (10 points), CHINTEK (10 points) is worth
for further evaluation.
Summary of Industry Comparison
In summary a point is given to each company to
evaluate each company competitiveness, operational and sustainability. Points
given are as follows:
Competitiveness
Criteria
|
Point
|
Greater
than 10 % Market Shares
|
5
|
8.01
% - 10.00 % Market shares
|
4
|
6.01
% - 8.00 % Market shares
|
3
|
3.01
% - 6.00 % Market shares
|
2
|
1.00
% - 3.00 % Market shares
|
1
|
Less
than 1%
|
0
|
Operational
Operation Margin for the top 30 oil palm company had
a median of 10.18 %
Criteria
|
Point
|
Greater
than 15.00 Operating Margin
|
5
|
12.00
– 15.00 Operating Margin
|
4
|
8.01
– 12.00 Operating Margin
|
3
|
5.01
– 8.00 Operating Margin
|
2
|
1.00
– 5.00 Operating Margin
|
1
|
0.00
– 1.00 Operating Margin
|
0
|
Less
than 0
|
Disqualified
|
Sustainability
Criteria
|
Point
|
No
Financial Cost
|
2
|
Greater
than 5 Interest Coverage Ratio
|
1
|
Less
than 5 Interest Coverage Ratio
|
0
|
Average Debt ratio for top 30 oil palm companies in
Malaysia is 0.37
Criteria
|
Point
|
Less
than 0.30
|
3
|
0.31
– 0.40
|
2
|
0.41
– 0.50
|
1
|
Greater
than 0.50
|
0
|
COMPANY
|
Competitiveness
|
Operational
|
Sustainability
|
Total
|
SIMEPLT
(5285)
|
5
|
5
|
2
|
12
|
FGV
(5222)
|
5
|
DIS
|
0
|
DIS
|
BKAWAN
(1899)
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
10
|
IOICORP
(1961)
|
5
|
5
|
1
|
11
|
KLK
(2445)
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
9
|
SOP
(5126)
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
BLDPLNT
(5069)
|
2
|
DIS
|
3
|
DIS
|
GENP
(2291)
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
7
|
UTDPLT
(2089)
|
1
|
5
|
4
|
10
|
KMLOONG
(5027)
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
9
|
TSH
(9059)
|
1
|
5
|
0
|
6
|
KWANTAS
(6572)
|
1
|
DIS
|
2
|
DIS
|
IJMPLNT
(2216)
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
7
|
BPLANT
(5254)
|
0
|
DIS
|
2
|
DIS
|
TAANN
(5012)
|
0
|
5
|
4
|
9
|
THPLANT
(5112)
|
0
|
5
|
0
|
5
|
KRETAM
(1996)
|
0
|
DIS
|
3
|
DIS
|
JTIASA
(4383)
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
HSPLANT
(5138)
|
0
|
3
|
5
|
8
|
FAREAST
(5029)
|
0
|
5
|
5
|
10
|
RSAWIT
(5113)
|
0
|
DIS
|
0
|
DIS
|
MHC
(5026)
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
6
|
SWKPLNT
(5135)
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
5
|
UMCCA
(2593)
|
0
|
3
|
4
|
7
|
CEPAT
(8982)
|
0
|
2
|
3
|
5
|
NPC
(5047)
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
TDM
(2054)
|
0
|
DIS
|
1
|
DIS
|
HARNLEN
(7501)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
CHINTEK
(1929)
|
0
|
5
|
5
|
10
|
INNO
(6262)
|
0
|
4
|
5
|
9
|
Summary of Industry Comparison