Sector : Industrial Products & Services
Sub
Sector :
Metals
This comparison would
look into companies that manufacture and trading steel products. There twenty
(20) companies in this industry:
Competitiveness
Market shares is
an importance indicator to determine the competitiveness of the company. Total
revenue make from manufacturing and trading of steel products for the year 2018
is RM 17,757,458,945.
COMPANY
|
REVENUE (STEEL
PRODUCT) 2018 (RM)
|
MARKET SHARE
(%)
|
2,317,942
|
0.01
|
|
2,321,422,000
|
13.07
|
|
155,857,852
|
0.88
|
|
500,258,000
|
2.82
|
|
1,381,471,225
|
7.78
|
|
62,367,153
|
0.35
|
|
125,860,073
|
0.71
|
|
1,127,777,000
|
6.35
|
|
167,376,000
|
0.94
|
|
597,401,593
|
3.36
|
|
3,175,173,000
|
17.88
|
|
1,496,853,000
|
8.43
|
|
821,043,984
|
4.62
|
|
546,856,003
|
3.08
|
|
614,771,219
|
3.46
|
|
577,410,000
|
3.25
|
|
3,698,191,000
|
20.83
|
|
64,241,000
|
0.36
|
|
222,209,901
|
1.25
|
|
99,601,000
|
0.56
|
Of the twenty companies, only three companies had
more than 10% of the market shares which are SSTEEL (20.83 %), LIONIND (17.88
%) and ANNJOO (13.07 %).
Operational
For operational, operating income of the companies had been review. Operating
income determine how much the companies’ revenue had turn into profit after
reduction cost of operating expense.
Besides operating income, operating margin ratio is
also calculated. Companies with higher operating margin ratio have more
probability to survive in today financial crisis. The median operating margin
ratio for this group of companies for 2018 is 3.78 %.
COMPANY
|
2018 OPERATING
INCOME (RM)
|
2018 OPERATING
MARGIN RATIO
|
- 393,439
|
-16.97
|
|
138,966,000
|
5.99
|
|
4,999,026
|
3.21
|
|
43,325,000
|
8.66
|
|
22,528,621
|
1.63
|
|
-
4,822,932
|
-7.73
|
|
4,256,411
|
3.38
|
|
94,494,000
|
8.38
|
|
- 503,421,000
|
-300.78
|
|
94,988,901
|
15.90
|
|
196,237,000
|
6.18
|
|
20,746,000
|
1.39
|
|
28,107,719
|
3.42
|
|
21,946,362
|
4.01
|
|
71,473,004
|
11.63
|
|
20,471,000
|
3.55
|
|
270,040,000
|
7.30
|
|
7,184,000
|
11.18
|
|
7,252,644
|
3.28
|
|
-6,093,000
|
-6.12
|
This sector of industry is in recession in 2018 itself
four out of twenty companies (20 %) operated in this sector had negative
operating income. In additional to that, from 2014 – 2019 only seven companies
out of twenty (35 %) have no negative operating income year. The companies are
CHOOBEE, EMETALL, HIAKTEK, LEONFB, PANTECH, PRESTAR and WZSATU.
Three companies having operating margin ratio for
more than 10 % in 2018 which are LEONFB (15.90%), PANTECH (11.63 %) and WZSATU
(11.18 %).
Sustainability
For the sustainability of the business, debt of the
companies is being review. There are two criteria to look at interest coverageratio,
which is used to determine how easy the companies able to pay off the interest
of outstanding debt and debt ratio.
The
median debt ratio for 2018 is 0.47.
COMPANY
|
2018 INTEREST
COVERAGE RATIO
|
2018 DEBT
RATIO
|
No Financial
Cost
|
0.05
|
|
3.25
|
0.51
|
|
19.06
|
0.10
|
|
217.71
|
0.08
|
|
No Financial
Cost
|
0.12
|
|
-0.85
|
0.69
|
|
1.38
|
0.47
|
|
5.15
|
0.46
|
|
-23.98
|
2.41
|
|
7.55
|
0.47
|
|
10.12
|
0.34
|
|
1.32
|
0.52
|
|
3.73
|
0.54
|
|
2.91
|
0.41
|
|
7.31
|
0.30
|
|
2.24
|
0.47
|
|
5.56
|
0.61
|
|
5.56
|
0.55
|
|
1.84
|
0.86
|
|
-3.23
|
0.38
|
AISB, CHOOBEE and CSCSTEL are good companies for
sustainability because they has either high or no interest coverage ratio and
low debt ratio.
Summary
In summary a point is given to each company to evaluate
each company competitiveness, operational and sustainability. Points given are as
follows:
Competitiveness
Criteria
|
Point
|
Greater
than 15 % Market Shares
|
5
|
10.01
% - 15.00 % Market shares
|
4
|
5.01
% - 10.00 % Market shares
|
3
|
2.51
% - 5.00 % Market shares
|
2
|
1.00
% - 2.50 % Market shares
|
1
|
Less
than 1%
|
0
|
Operational
Criteria
|
Point
|
Greater
than 10.00 Operating Margin
|
5
|
5.01
– 10.00 Operating Margin
|
4
|
3.01
– 5.00 Operating Margin
|
3
|
2.01
– 3.00 Operating Margin
|
2
|
1.01
– 2.00 Operating Margin
|
1
|
0.00
– 1.00 Operating Margin
|
0
|
Less
than 0
|
Disqualified
|
Sustainability
Criteria
|
Point
|
No
Financial Cost
|
2
|
Greater
than 10 Interest Coverage Ratio
|
1
|
Less
than 10 Interest Coverage Ratio
|
0
|
Criteria
|
Point
|
Less
than 0.25
|
3
|
0.25
– 0.50
|
2
|
0.50
– 0.60
|
1
|
Greater
than 0.60
|
0
|
COMPANY
|
Competitiveness
|
Operational
|
Sustainability
|
Total
|
0
|
DIS
|
5
|
DIS
|
|
4
|
DIS
|
1
|
DIS
|
|
0
|
DIS
|
4
|
DIS
|
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
10
|
|
3
|
DIS
|
5
|
DIS
|
|
0
|
DIS
|
0
|
DIS
|
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
5
|
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
9
|
|
0
|
DIS
|
0
|
DIS
|
|
0
|
5
|
2
|
7
|
|
2
|
DIS
|
3
|
DIS
|
|
5
|
DIS
|
1
|
DIS
|
|
2
|
DIS
|
1
|
DIS
|
|
2
|
DIS
|
2
|
DIS
|
|
2
|
5
|
2
|
9
|
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
7
|
|
5
|
DIS
|
0
|
DIS
|
|
0
|
5
|
1
|
6
|
|
1
|
DIS
|
0
|
DIS
|
|
0
|
DIS
|
2
|
DIS
|
Summary of Stock Reviews
Summary of Industry Comparison
No comments:
Post a Comment